Cheers Rey, sterling work.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Rey Bango To: CF-Talk Sent: Thu Aug 31 20:36:41 2006 Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using? Go to my blog: http://www.reybango.com I've kept a list there. Rey... Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote: > Has anyone done a definitive list of the best frameworks we are all using? > > > > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: John C. Bland II > To: CF-Talk > Sent: Thu Aug 31 19:33:05 2006 > Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using? > > By 0 to 60 I am referring to the learning curve. Backbase has a steep one. > > Exactly on the pricing. If they had reasonable pricing for not just large > corp's, they might have a better adoption because it is very robust. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:49 AM > Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using? > > > >>Yep, I have used it extentively and I love it. You described it to a tee. >>It >>is an application framework not a library in the sense of other listings. >>It >>is a Flex HTML rival. It is not aiming to be an plug n play js library. >> >>What is all this nonsense about 0 to 60? :-) >> >>It's debugging is amazing, it has all the features you can think of, but >>again, as you rightly note it is expensive. But as they noted, large >>companies such as ours do not care about 5K :-) >> >>If money is not your concern and you want to build an RIA app, not just an >>Ajax tool then it should be considered. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, >>Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, >>Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is >>confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of >>the >>intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please >>note >>that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the >>information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have >>received this communication in error please return it to the sender or >>call >>our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within >>this >>communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." >>Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: John C. Bland II >>To: CF-Talk >>Sent: Thu Aug 31 17:12:39 2006 >>Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using? >> >>Neil, Backbase is more robust, I'll give it that, but have you used it. >>Speaking specifically about 0 to 60, Backbase is horrible. It takes you >>completely away from your normal way of handling xhtml and attempts to >>provide MXML/XAML functionality. The things it can do are pretty >>amazing/great but their implementation simply isn't desireable AND the >>price >> >>is ridiculous.When I spoke to them about it the reps answer was (in my >>words; it has been some months since I spoke to them) "the big companies >>don't mind the price." We went round and round but ultimately he said to >>wait a few weeks for an announcement regarding the community edition. >>Anyways, Backbase forces you to change your entire infrastructure and base >>it around them. For Ajax, that isn't desireable. >> >>I doubt Tom is using Spry because it is free. Spry is a great tool and 0 >>to >>60, as I said, it is #1 in my book. Most ajax toolkits are free and those >>that cost, to me, aren't worth it. You can grab a DHTML library and >>something like JSMX and rival Backbase, or others, any day. >> >>Disclaimer: >>That is all IMO. :-) >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]> >>Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 3:55 AM >>Subject: RE: Ajax - Whats everybody using? >> >> >> >>>That only cause it is free? I would say Backbase is better than Spry but >>>it >>>is pricey >>> >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: 31 August 2006 11:36 >>>To: CF-Talk >>>Subject: Re: Ajax - Whats everybody using? >>> >>>On Thursday 31 August 2006 05:21, Rey Bango wrote: >>> >>>>For those doing Ajax work in conjunction with CF, I'd like to know what >>>>framework(s) you're using. >>> >>>Flex2 :-) >>>More seriously, if I were doing a DHTML project I'd pick Spry. >>> >>>-- >>> >>>Tom Chiverton >>>Helping to autoschediastically initiate fifth-generation metrics >>> >>>**************************************************** >>> >>>This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. >>> >>>Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England >>>and >>>Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is >>>at >>>St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is >>>available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a >>>partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. >>>Regulated by the Law Society. >>> >>>CONFIDENTIALITY >>> >>>This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and >>>may >>>be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you >>>must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy >>>it >>>nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its >>>existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please >>>delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. >>> >>>For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251691 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
