Sorry guys. We are using CF MX 7. So, do we agree that this code does not need the locking, and also that this code has the power to crash a CF server under high traffic?
Please let me know. Thanks, K On 8/31/06, Mary Jo Sminkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I would argue that that is not only a horrible abuse (LOCKING on SEVER to > >set something in SESSION), but that this situation doesn't even need a lock > >at all. > > That's assuming that the server is CFMX, not CF5 (which the OP didn't > specify), otherwise a lock is indeed needed. Pretty awful code regardless (in > more than one way!) > > Mary Jo > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251707 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
