If your servers are on a domain, you can use DFS to keep them in sync.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peterson, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 7:28 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Disaster recovery license for Coldfusion
> 
> Russ,
> 
> That's the ticket, I think I am going that route.  Then I can sync
> everything daily and just swap over when / if disaster strikes.
> Excellent idea, one of those 'why didn't I think of that' ones!!
> 
> Chris Peterson
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 5:22 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Disaster recovery license for Coldfusion
> 
> Sometimes physical servers do have exceptions on licensing.  I believe
> MS allows you to use the same license for a failover box for sql (at
> least that's what I remember reading somewhere).
> 
> I don't see why you can't just install the developer version of CF, and
> have that waiting for a failover, and then just plug in the license when
> you actually do need to fail over to it.
> 
> Russ
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:36 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Disaster recovery license for Coldfusion
> >
> > I have not heard of this premise before.  The whole purpose of a
> > failover is to be online and waiting for a failure from a primary
> > server.  Having the server turned off would defeat the speed of a
> > failover box.  Unless you are dealing with Virtual servers failovers
> > where licensing can get grey, physical servers tend not to have
> > exceptions on server licenses.
> >
> > Teddy
> >
> > On 8/31/06, Alan Rother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to preface this response by saying, "I don't really know,
> > > I'm just guessing."
> > >
> > > With that in mind, I would say no, you can't do that. If you have
> > > the thing turned on and running, with all of the software installed
> > > waiting for a failover, I think you would need a seperate license.
> > > Now if you had a spare box, turned off and with no software
> > > installed and a failure occurred
> > and
> > > THEN you installed the license from the now dead box, that would be
> ok.
> > >
> > > Think of it this way, you are using that second box, maybe not
> > > actively, but you are using it. Do you think Microsoft would accept
> > > the same argument with regards to any of it's products?
> > >
> > > The best way I can come up with determining if you should buy
> > > another license for anything is by placing value on it. If by having
> 
> > > the
> > software
> > > on
> > > a server and up and running you are in effect getting value out of
> it.
> > The
> > > value it is giving you is piece of mind and saved time in the event
> > > of a failure.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents. When in doubt, read the EULA
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alan Rother
> > > Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251782
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to