Thanks, Tom and Steven. Steven, it is really so.5 that my CFMX 6.1 is looking for. I've read the tip on checking which rpm provides which on some other forum, and the libs I need comes from the openssl package. The openssql-9.7f which comes with FC4 has the so.5 libs, the openssl that comes with FC5 does not have the so.5, it has so.6 and so.4 but no so.5s whatsoever. FC5 does not have the openssl-9.7f.
Does anyone here have successfully ran CFMX 6.1 on FC5? I am inferring that CFMX 7 can install on FC5, but not CFMX 6.1, the same way that a Postgres installer for FC4 won't install on FC5. I read from somewhere that I need to make an so.5 link that points to some other so's. I haven't tried, though. I am not very familiar with the library files. Thanks anyways. >Please confirm the name of the missing library. I believe it may be >libc.so.6 not .5. > >Using the rpm command it can be determined which package should have >installed a file. Try rpm --query --redhatprovides <filename> (ref 1). >On a RHEL4 system, /lib/libc.so.6 is installed by the glibc-2.3.4 >package, same as CentOS. > >I don't have my FC5 installation in front of me, but I believe it has a >newer glibc version. Checking Fedora package list I see it has 2.4-11 >(ref 2), and it does appear that 2.4-11 should have installed libc.so.6 >(ref 3). You may want to confirm the missing library name, confirm the >package which should have installed the library, and then install that >package. > >On the topic of distributions, if you must run a distro which is >unsupported by Red Hat and unsupported by ColdFusion, then I would >recommend CentOS rather than Fedora. Even Red Hat will tell you this. >CentOS is a legal clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux so Cent shares the >same stability, reliability, and security as RHEL (ref 4). Fedora on >the other hand is a bleeding edge distribution with the most bells and >whistles and features which have not necessarily been tested to the >extent that RHEL is tested. Since ColdFusion is supported for use on >RHEL4, while you cannot open a support ticket with Adobe for support of >CF on Cent, you can assume that CF will install and run the same, >whereas results with Fedora will be in question. > >For the last 2 months I have been using ColdFusion MX 7 on CentOS (among >other OSes), and have been very satisfied. > >-Steven Erat >Adobe ColdFusion QA > > >Refs >*1 >http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch-command-reference.h >tml >*2 http://fedoranews.org/cms/node/1617 >*3 >http://rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/fedora/updates/5/x86_64/glibc-2.4-11.i386. >html >*4 http://linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/5823/1/ > > > > > > > >> What do you think? Have I left out anything in the installation? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253554 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
