You know, FB is nice (Or it was a few years ago), but that is the reason I never jumped into later versions of FB...It is more like Microsoft and waiting for a patch to come out, or spending hours upon hours staring at someone elses code looking for the problem. I think I liked FB alot more in version 1 and 2.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandra Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:57 AM Subject: RE: Two FB applications sharing application scope when not supposed to > Download FB5 from fusebox.org. It solves this problem and is backward > compatible with FB4.1 > > > Sandra Clark > ============================== > http://www.shayna.com > Training in Cascading Style Sheets and Accessibility > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alistair Knock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 7:35 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Two FB applications sharing application scope when not supposed to > > Hi, > > We have a problem in that there are 3 live applications, plus 2 two > development applications, all based on Fusebox 4.1 running on the same CFMX > server. Each application has its own cfapplication tag in Application.cfm, > and each application sits in a different directory. (they're all in the > same domain - the server also runs other domains) > > During development, we didn't have any problems, but now that the > applications are live, one of them appears to be using the other's > Application scope! e.g. application Angela runs OK and the application > scope contains the fusebox structure for Angela, but when Barbara is run, it > occasionally uses Barbara's fusebox structure, and occasionally uses > Angela's structure. Clearly it fails, since the circuit design and > fuseactions are radically different in each application. > > I have read talk about application scope snooping etc. but that doesn't seem > to be relevant here - if each FB application is defined with its own > cfapplication name and session management (using a application.cfm in each > application's root directory), surely the applications shouldn't get mixed > up? > > (examples of errors: can't find the parsed file > Barbara/parsed/home.welcome.cfm - this is because there isn't even a home > circuit specified in Barbara/fusebox.xml... ) > > Any thoughts would be most appreciated! > > K > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:254355 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
