Andy Matthews wrote: > > I'm using your CFC, starting with an >= 800 pixel wide image, and creating 3 > sizes of it. The smallest size at 160 wide looks pretty rough. Do you have > any input in improving the quality? Here's the call to scaleX:
Try playing around with the compression. I don't think I've ever used anything below 90. There may also be some advantages to using an alternative interpolation.. See line 446: <cfset rh.put(rh.KEY_INTERPOLATION, rh.VALUE_INTERPOLATION_BICUBIC)> <!--- NEAREAST_NEIGHBOR, BILINEAR, BICUBIC ---> Change INTERPOLATION_BICUBIC to INTERPOLATION_BILINEAR to see if it makes a difference. I haven't really played with this setting much. Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:254428 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
