> Is it still necessary to put a named cflock around network protocol > tags like cfhttp with CF MX? My co-worker says yes, but everything > I've found so far that says locks should be used refers to pre-MX CF. > Anyone know for sure? > Thanks! > Rob Pilic
Thanks guys, I appreciate the comments! Ben, the arguments I saw for locking cfhttp is that not doing so might result in pcode errors and might cause a race condition in the resulting cfhttp struct where the response is stored - all stuff that sounds like pre-MX, so that's why I asked. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:256436 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
