Hmm, perhaps because that's the framework we wanted the application done with? I wonder what we'd have done if a consulting firm had that in their proposal "Fusebox, what an over blated piece of shit....".
Do you go to the car dealer and say "I just want any car that will get me to the methodone clinic the fastest."? Or do you go there and say "I would like an AMC Pacer with low miles and an 8-track player to get me to the methodone clinic". I bet you do the latter. Good Luck Greg On 11/3/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fusebox, what an over blated piece of shit.... > > No seriously why does a framework have anything to do with a quote being > won, tell me I use my own framework till I got stuck into MG:U and it has > worked and performed much faster and not as bloated as fusebox is. > > So, tell me again why being a fusebox developer would win me a contract? > It > shouold boil down to can I deliver on time, will I met the budget set > forth, > and will I be able to deliver the product the client needs:-) > > Shit, there are times when I know MG:U and MachII aren't upto the job. So > what makes fusebox the be all and end all to determine a job:-) > > > > > On 11/4/06, Greg Luce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I was shopping the same thing last year and ended up with WebApper > > Services > > (SeeFusion fellas). They nosed out Figleaf, Teratech, and a handful of > > others. I was looking for cutting edge Fusebox development though. My 2 > > main > > factors were technology and cost. They won on both. > > > > Greg > > > > On 11/2/06, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I know a few of the guys at AboutWeb and wouldn't hesistate to > > > recommend the company based on my perceptions of their skills. > > > > > > I have no experience with the company itself (as a client, contractor, > > > employee, or otherwise). But if the sum of the parts is greater than > > > the whole, I think you'd be in very good shape. > > > > > > On 11/2/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Who are the top 3 companies that develop ColdFusion on a > > > > > project basis? > > > > > > > > It depends on way too many things. What coding styles do you prefer > > > > (frameworks or not, etc.), if you need project management, your > > budget, > > > > where the company is based, timeline, etc. > > > > > > > > This is like the question we see here about once a week, "What > hosting > > > > company do you prefer". The answer? It depends. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > This transmission may contain information that is privileged, > > > confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If > you > > are > > > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > disclosure, > > > copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein > > (including > > > any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this > > > transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and > destroy > > the > > > material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. > > Thank > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================== > > > > "EMF <idahopower.com>" made the previous annotations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:259070 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
