On 06/11/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FarCry shares some of the same theoretical approaches to > > content management that Spectra had, but none of the internal > > machinery. Most peoples difficulty with FarCry stems from > > the installation -- and often this is caused by an assumption > > that reading the manual is not required. > > Presumably, unlike Spectra, no blood sacrifice is required.
LOL -- we also had a routine that involved sacrificial chickens, and spinning around three times for luck. Amongst other things, the CF/Siteminder implementation (more affectionately known as Sitekiller) left a lot to be desired. > > FarCry CMS is an out of the box solution that runs atop the > > FarCry Framework. It's both a solution and a tool box for > > building more sophisticated options. > > That sounds a little better for most people. I don't think Spectra gave you > much in the way of a workable front-end. Aye. FarCry installs with a very workable front end. Beyond perhaps changing the look and feel, little or no modification is required to have a fully operational site. This has left many with the misconception that FarCry only does content management and nothing else. geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:259241 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
