My core complaint is that cfoop is using java terms while not using java.
Then I listed the power features of java within  a single class (the class
object) and thus coldfusion gains without any outside help etc 1. compile
classes 2. use of reflection 3. decomplie classes. These are the valuable
inputs I provided but have been disgarded in favor of a blank space.


On 11/22/06, Nicholas M Tunney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm curious as to why you think cFoop is wrong as well.
>
> Nic
>
> Aaron Roberson wrote:
> > Dan,
> >
> > You keep referring to stuff that may or may not be on another thread.
> > "my AJAX and CF analogy" and "my JODE example." I really don't have a
> > clue what you are talking about and why you think that cfoop.org is
> > all wrong.
> >
> > Are you just trolling or do you have some valuable input that we
> > should be considering?
> >
> > Respectfully,
> > Aaron
> >
> > On 11/22/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Even cfoop.org is all wrong. "Creating a Class in ColdFusion"
> >>
> >> That's more about creating components in CF. The class object in
> coldfusion
> >> is the most powerful object because
> >> it can create almost any object just like createObject() via forName(),
> >> reflection for object inspection (think cfdump) , rule breaking (more
> >> reflection stuff) and decompiling via my JODE example.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/22/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> You forgot Air Methods, unreasonable cake and strictly forbidden.
> >>>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:261460
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to