It would also be good for allowing blog comments to only have small html tags. It's a cool UDF to be sure.
So, are you saying that the attribute value IS going to be an issue, or it is not? Sorry, I was just a bit confused if you needed any more ideas? ...................... Ben Nadel Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX7 Developer www.bennadel.com Need ColdFusion Help? www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/ -----Original Message----- From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: UDF inspection, please! Ben Nadel wrote: > Sorry for the wild goose chase regarding the ".". I think I never > learned it thoroughly. Its good to know. Good testing sometimes involves wild goose chases :) > Yeah, regular expressions are awesome... Except sometimes when you > have to them to NOT do something, EXCEPT IF. I agree, go with it. Just > document that it might be an issue. IMO, not worth fixing something > that's not an issue yet. I removed the comment stripping capability, since it's really not necessary and simplifies the code. There would still be an issue with quoted attributes containing > characters, but unwanted tags would still be stripped. Like this string: <embed value="><embed ...>"> foo Would be left with "> foo Instead of the desired foo This whole thing came up so I could strip embed, object, applet, link, and script tags out of HTML emails being viewed in a webmail interface. Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:261937 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
