Then I missed that condition. If the premise is the absence of triple multiplicities, then you will hav items^slots - itemslots, thus 3^3 - the permutations were one item has all three items slots sets. 3^3 - 3 and thus 24. This changes quickly if you have more items than slots and have to determine which multiplicities you want to exclude.
Teddy On 11/29/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is just a permutation set of all possible combinations of three items > that allow repeats. > > But it was NOT a set of all possible combinations. For example 000, 888 > and FFF were not desired results for my problem. > > > -------------- > Ian Skinner > Web Programmer > BloodSource > www.BloodSource.org > Sacramento, CA > > --------- > | 1 | | > --------- Binary Soduko > | | | > --------- > > "C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!" > - Cynthia Dunning > > Confidentiality Notice: This message including any > attachments is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender and > delete any copies of this message. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:262072 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
