> It's possible that the original author uses his own coding styles and > rules, and integrating a fusebox or mach-ii based app might be too > much trouble.
Yes, but that's exactly my point. With an unknown code base, there's no way to know how easy or hard it would be to integrate into ANY coding style, framework or not. I certainly have plenty of users that use my product with non-FB sites, it doesn't force them to code everything they do that way. > Just because you don't use a "common" framework doesn't mean there > isn't logic and design to your code. As I did say. But there's no way to know that, or to know if that logic or design will match your own logic and design. Generally with an off-the-shelf product, you're going to drop it into a separate directory and call it from there (unless you use it to run the entire site which many people may do). You don't want to integrate it highly into existing code for a simple reason...it makes updates a real PITA. -------------------- Mary Jo Sminkey http://www.cfwebstore.com CFWebstore, ColdFusion E-commerce ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:262571 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
