Well, I would imagine that they are saying this for good reasons. Most of us as developers do not see the impact of exclusive locks, or at least not enough to notice a difference in performance. It is possible that as a hosting company running several shared servers that the impact would be far greater. I think that before we dismiss what they are saying, we should get it from the horses mouth so to speak and contact Macromedia on the subject.
Doug B. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 4:05 AM Subject: Re: memory issue with session scope in custom tags? > Daniel Roberts wrote: > > I just got the following advice in a HostMySite CF newsletter. Is there an > > issue with session scopes in custom tags? > > No. > > > > ---- > > Coding Tip > > > > Discover methods used by HostMySite's CFMX gurus to address your common > > coding and performance issues. Stop by the Developers' Forum to discuss with > > fellow ColdFusion users. > > Duplicate Your Session Scopes to Relieving Memory Issues > > > > When you use custom tags to place exclusive locks around the session scope, > > ... you can expect the same problems as when you place exlusive locks around the session scope without using custom tags. > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:262652 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
