Wow, my experience is exactly the opposite. CFC's for me allow granularity - each named function has 1 purpose. I control its input and its output, and I can test it independent of any other code. I tend to write all my functions, and then just wire them up in a separate template.
As far as where CF8 is going, remember you don't have to use CFC's if they don't work well for you, you can still do old-skool UDF's, CFX_ tags, etc. Do it how you want, its just a new option available! Chris -----Original Message----- From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:50 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFC's I came across this post where people were discussing the use of smith as an alternative to CFMX. Anyways, I was wondering what other peoples thoughts on the subject were. I have to agree that Macromedia Coldfusion is kind of getting away from what made CFML so popular and that was rapid developement. It seems that it is taking me twice as long to write alot of the code (using CFC's) then it did before hand, and the complication level has also increased. I am afraid to look at CFMX 8 as I feel that OO is the way CF is going. Message: While more competition in the CFML market is a great thing, this engine won't run any of the popular frameworks as it is missing one of the most important features of CFML; CFCs!!! Think of saying you have developed a Java engine, but it doesn't support user defined classes! Not much point. So yes, if all an engine had to do was to support simple Tags and CFML functions, then of coure it would be fast. Reply: Actually, I regard this as a Good Thing. CF is a champion for pounding out small sites quickly. I'd go as far to say that in that capacity probably nothing can beat it. I haven't seen anything that beats <cfquery> .... <cfoutput>. CFCs tried to bring objects and OO to CF, and they've gone a long way to destroying the principal strength of the language - simplicity. Take a look at the CF community these days and most of what you'll find is intellectual masturbation. They're going down the same road Java went down recently. A proliferation of frameworks, to the point where they have numerous ORMs and even a Spring clone. You have to wonder if at any point these guys don't say, "Hmm, why don't we just use Java?" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:263734 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
