Do you know if the code was from a recent version of MX? I'm pretty sure that even as of MX 6, <cfscript> was faster...and you could see in the decompiled code why (as you mention below). However, I believe that as of MX 6.1 (and onward), that was no longer the case.
I could be wrong, so I'm curious to know what CF platform these tests were conducted on. On 12/18/06, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jon, > > I just posted that so you'd know where I got my information. Phillip > *has* actually decompiled the JIT code and seen that for complex > examples that CFScript is faster, because it's closer in resemblance to > the byte code that ColdFusion ultimately parses. Phillip just stated > better than I could have. -- Charlie Griefer ================================================ "...All the world shall be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with a swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:264375 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
