The only problem with using Railo is it doesn't amount to any savings for those of us who host multiple websites on our own server.
The price is practically the same as Adobe's CF server. If the price were significantly less, then it would be more attractive and worth the effort to do the work necessary to implement a 3rd party CF server. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Gert Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:11 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Application.cfc vs cfm Hi Ray, in Railo 1.1 you can configure this setting. In the Railo administrator you will be able to set the Application Listeners as follows: Type: none - No Application.cfm and Application.cfc will be included classic - First look for Application.cfm and after the request for OnRequestEnd.cfm (like < CF7) modern - Look only for Application.cfc mixed - Looks for Application.cfc and if not existing for Application.cfm/OnRequestEnf.cfm (Like >= CF7) Mode: Current: Look only in the current directory for one of the files above Root: Look only in the root directory for one of the files above Curr2Root: Like CF So you can configure Railo in the way you like... Greetings / Grüsse Gert Franz Customer Care Railo Technologies GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.railo.ch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:264462 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
