I was directed to the following link, which appears to have promise, but
haven't researched it enough yet to know.

http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/citext/projdisplay.php

As far as a case-insensitive collation, I've found absolutely nothing that
suggests you can do so on an imported database.  As was mentioned by Dave in
a previous response, you *might* be able to use LC_Collate when creating a
new database, but I haven't found a definitive answer on that yet.  Still
searching.


Matt


On 1/13/07, Dave Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frankly, I agree with Matt that search behavior really should be case
> insensitive. I've wanted to check out postgres for a while, but finding
> this
> out may well slow me down.
>
> If, like most other dbs, searching for calculated expressions
> (LCASE(some_column) = 'foo' etc) is significantly inefficient, how are you
> supposed to manage this in the real world? Only idea I had was to store
> every
> possibly searchable value in mixed case for display, and somewhere else in
> all
> lowercase for searching.
>
> The other thing is that this makes it hard to use postgres as a drop-in
> replacement for most other common dbs. Sure, you could (re-)design the app
> from scratch to handle what most other dbs usually do automatically, but
> if
> that's really what you have to do, it seems like a much bigger decision
> than
> dealing with the much less pervasive syntax differences between vendors.
>
> Are folks really sure that no case-insensitive collation option is
> available?
>
> Dave
>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:266514
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to