It's not really JRun's fault in this instance. Our networking group blocks multicast across subnets, so the traffic is cut off. I get the fact that it's one of the main reasons to have multiple subnets, but it's a pain. JRun will work fine, so long as the security.properties file is edited to reflect the search across subnets.
Matthew Williams AJ Mercer wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > could you explain to me what the issue is with multicast across subnets? > > We have clustering across two servers which are on different subnets. CF > lets you set up the cluster without any problems, but the instances on the > server on the other subnet are not being used. > > Thank you. > > > On 1/24/07, Matthew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So, my environment stands as such: >> >> 7 servers, 7 clusters, and 17 CF instances. Half have been migrated to >> CF7, the other half are on CF6 (destined to be migrated shortly). The >> clusters all use J2EE sessions for failover. >> >> I'm having issues in one of the CF7 clusters. Due to limitations with our >> networking setup (no multicast allowed across subnets), I've been limited to >> just one clustered instance of CF for 50+ applications. This is being >> addressed tomorrow (yay!), but it's been delayed due to issues with policy, >> rules, etc. >> >> I've finally gotten licenses and permission to install FusionReactor, and >> I put it in place on all servers this past weekend. I also took the liberty >> of installing the JDBC wrapper provided by FusionReactor to get a better >> idea of what our... uh, "intensive" apps are doing. I noticed a HUGE spike >> in memory usage today, and when I checked, one of our apps had taken 40 >> seconds to complete its request, of which 21 seconds were strictly database >> related, and used several hundred megs of memory. The result set returned >> was over 100k records. I'm not sure if this got loaded into a shared memory >> scope, but it might explain why session replication is failing constantly. >> >> So, does anyone have a "Best Practice" for the amount of results that >> should be returned into a shared environment? I'm thinking at this point >> that there is very little need to work with more than 1000 records at a >> given time (at least within ColdFusion... if data manipulation is required, >> that's why stored procedures and functions exist in Oracle). Now, with the >> datasource wrapper within the FusionReactor JDBC calls, I CAN limit the >> amount of information received by ColdFusion. I just need to get another >> set of eyes on this before I present it as a policy change. >> >> Matthew Williams >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:267451 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
