No one would be forced to use the masking email address. It's an option. Actually, I've seen lists where the From is the list address and the to was the person receiving the mail. Having both the from and to set to CF-Talk might be legal.
> Michael Dinowitz wrote: >> The new system will totally obscure the from address of any post sent out >> through the system. For example, you post will have a FROM line that >> looks >> like this: >> Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > No thank you. That is not my e-mail address. That is not how people can > contact me offlist. If I didn't want to be reachable, I would register a > second e-mail address, set it to nomail and send from one and receive from > the other. > > >> I'd like to ask you if you think that the null@ is a good idea based on >> the >> RFC? Will it cause posts to be considered spam? > > I think all of this rewriting is a very bad idea. It goes directly against > RFC 2822. As listmaster you can add a Sender header and that is it, you > are not allowed to change the From header. > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:267892 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
