I agree, thank you Andy.

We first plan to buy Adobe and then Microsoft, if they don't implement 
some of our features :-)

We will adapt everything the market needs in order to make switches from 
another engine to Railo as easy as possible.

Large CMS like Contens, a sophisticated MachII application now runs both 
on Railo and CFMX with no changes in code.

Gert


Andy Matthews schrieb:
> But I don't see any reason why competing engines can't further growth in the
> "official" engine. A perfect case is Macromedia and Adobe's competition in
> the WYSIWYG editor (Dreamweaver vs Go-Live) or even better in the image
> editor (Fireworks vs Imageready).
>
> Adobe and Macromedia ALWAYS leapfrogged each other in features until of
> course Adobe bought MM. There's no reason why Adobe can't implement features
> from other engines.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:03 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?
>
> Indeed, and you always will as in all reality it will be Adobe who define
> the CFML language (albeit not official") and any competing engine will
> always be behind that set.  Of course there are times when new systems
> provide additional functionality but any one expecting CFML will expect the
> the base minimum which ColdFusion provides I would think.
>
>
>
>    
>
>
>
>
>  
> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
> Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
> confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gert Franz
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wed Feb 07 22:52:30 2007
> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?
>
> Flash Remoting
> is supported by Railo 1.0. But only the calls to .cfm files. A AMF Filter is
> included. Railo 1.1
>
> Event gateways:
> we won't implement this feature yet. We need to leave arguments for others
> :-)
>
> Recordsets from stored procedures:
> In 1.0 it is possible to call stored procedures in <cfquery>. Railo 1.1 will
> support <cfstoredproc*>
>
>
> What about the others?
>
> struct(), array(), query(), arrayfind(), dump(), <cfdump eval="">, <cfadmin>
> Server and web administrator?
>
> I know we still have work to do. But we will...
>
> Gert
>
> Dave Watts schrieb:
>   
>>> There are plenty of reasons to use Railo, but before I get 
>>> into that, can you give an example of an important CFMX 
>>> feature that Railo lacks?
>>>     
>>>       
>> Flash Remoting?
>> Event Gateway?
>> Recordsets from stored procedures?
>>
>> Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
>> http://www.figleaf.com/
>>
>> Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
>> instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
>> Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location.
>> Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information!
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:269153
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to