Andy,

I apologize for replying before thinking about my replies.  I was not
meaning to get personal, although I can certainly understand that I came
across as such.  Again, I apologize.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion, as am I entitled to mine.  What
angered me, and I would guess most others as well, is how you are telling us
what's best for us, the community, based upon your personal belief/value
system.  Simply put, neither you, nor I, nor any other -individual- is
entitled to determine what is best for the -community-.  That is reserved
for the community as a whole to decide.

Now then, when it comes to spec work, I actually agree with you.   Recently,
one of my clients, after we had agreed to terms, pricing, etc on another new
project for them, comes back a couple of weeks later and says "okay, I need
a spec doc by in the morning".  I told him that a spec doc wasn't part of
the agreement, and it was going to cost X amount in addition to get it
done.  As hard as that is to do to a returning client, I did it because,
like you, I won't do spec work for free.

The problem here (other than the whole "what's good for the community"
aspect) is that I cannot for the life me understand how you can consider a
-community- project to be spec work.   It isn't anything even close to spec
work.  It's a group of individuals, in this case designers, who are
submitting their "ideas", which may or may not be used (as is the case in
ALL -community- projects), in an effort to give back to the -community- out
of gratitude for what the -community- has done for them in the past.

Again, my apologies for making it personal, as that was most definitely not
my intent.  I responded *incorrectly* out of anger over being told by
someone else what was good (or not good) for me.


Matt


On 2/12/07, Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I apologize for the last two emails I sent out. This conversation was
> obviously over with and I started it up again.
>
> Please don't responsd to either of these. I'm the one being a jerk.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 8:18 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Fusebox Web Site Design Contest Announced
>
> Matt...
>
> Why are you being a jerk? It's obvious to me that all you're trying to do
> is
> to stir up trouble. If you had taken even a few moments to read the links
> that I posted in my second email, you would have read that there are LOADS
> of orgranizations who feel the same way I do about spec work.
>
> So do ME a favor and don't make this personal. If you don't agree with me,
> that's fine...I won't lose any sleep over it.
>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:269580
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to