"produce" offerings? Of course, these are software "products", not fruit and vegetables. :-)
> Hi Rick, > > I think the differences are: > > 1) BlueDragon is tested and certified by BEA's quality assurance (QA) > test team; CFMX is not. The BEA QA testers and technical support staff > are trained on BlueDragon; they're not trained on CFMX. > > 2) When you have a problem or question with BlueDragon on WebLogic, > you have one place to go: BEA tech support. There's a formal > communication channel in place between BEA and New Atlanta tech > support for resolving integration issues. > > 3) When you have a problem or question with CFMX on WebLogic, you > first have to figure out if it's a CFMX problem or a WebLogic problem, > then contact either Adobe or BEA as appropriate. There's no formal > communication channel in place between BEA and Adobe tech support for > resolving integration issues. > > 4) New Atlanta has direct access to BEA WebLogic engineers to assist > during product development, which is one reason we're able to support > packed WARs, and is why BlueDragon will support WebLogic 10 as soon as > it ships next month (while CFMX is only adding support for WebLogic 9. > 2 in Scorpio sometime later in 2007, more than two full years after > BlueDragon supported WebLogic 9.0). > > There are real, tangible differences in the two produce offerings. > > Vince > > >On 2/21/07, Vince Bonfanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> But we quibble, since BlueDragon remains the only CFML engine > officially > >> supported by BEA (and, in fact, BlueDragon is sold and supported by > BEA as a > >> BEA product). > > > > > >I hate these arguments. As long as CFMX is officially supported on > BEA by > >ADOBE, that's good enough for me. I think it's also nice that > Bluedragon is > >officially supported by BEA. Of course, as a CFMX user, I'd prefer > to get > >my support from the authors of the software, not the vendors of the > >platform. > > > >I like bluedragon, I really do... but the fact that it's supported > and sold > >by BEA is no different, in my opinion, than the fact that Adobe > OFFICIALLY > >SUPPORTS and SELLS CFMX for use on BEA. Adobe has people trained to > support > >CFMX on BEA. BEA has people trained to support Bluedragon on BEA. > > >Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:270333 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
