That can definitely be done.

Rey...

Jones Eric R Ctr 8 AF Det 1/AFNOC wrote:
> What we really need is a digg style voting system. So those sites which
> get voted as being a "Great Example" get featured placement while others
> fall lower on the listing. This way the blogs and NSF sites could still
> be listed but might possibly be shown way down the listing.
> 
> ---------------_____________________________________________________
> 
> Eric R. Jones
> Senior Web Application Developer, AFNOC/NCD
> Barksdale AFB, LA
> DSN 781-7784
> Comm (318) 456-7784
> NIPRNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SIPRNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:40 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
> 
> I think what could be a really nice thing is to have a "complete" list,
> and
> a "impressive" list. It would be as simple as a boolean in the sites
> table.
> Sites like Fedex, BankofAmerica, etc. That could be the default list,
> then
> if they want to see the entire list, they could. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:19 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
> 
> I meant that Adobe should be doing the hard work promoting CF (but as we
> all
> know they f@"& up that task on a daily basis).
> 
> It should be up to you to compile a "who is using ColdFusion" as I
> personally think no one is going to look at it and make a decision to
> use
> ColdFusion or not, especially when some of the showcase pieces are just
> blogs.
> 
> Anyway... this thread has cf-community written all over it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
> Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
> confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of
> the
> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please
> note
> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or
> the
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you
> have
> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or
> call
> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within
> this
> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rey Bango
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Tue Mar 20 21:13:40 2007
> Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
> 
> Ah okay. Kind of caught me by surprise. :-)
> 
> Rey
> 
> Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
>> Lol, not what I meant at all.
>>
>>
>>
>> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
> 
>> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed 
>> Business, Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains 
>> information which is confidential and may also be privileged.  It is 
>> for the exclusive use of
> the
>> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) 
>> please
> note
>> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or
> 
>> the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If 
>> you have received this communication in error please return it to the 
>> sender or
> call
>> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within
> this
>> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed
> Exhibitions." 
>> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rey Bango
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Sent: Tue Mar 20 20:29:24 2007
>> Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
>>
>> Wow, thanks for that vote of confidence Neil. Just makes me want to go
> 
>> out and do more with GotCFM. :(
>>
>> Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
>>> To be fair though, it shouldn't be up to you to do this, it resides
> solely
>>> in the camp of Adobe - they should be doing this.  Your site is a 
>>> good listing but I don't think it will make any difference to the way
>> ColdFusion
>>> is seen.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJQ 

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:273211
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to