> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality > > While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was > wondering if > WDDX still has value that is not currently offered in the XML support > of CF > 7.02. Seems like opedwddx.org is pretty stale.
It's just as valuable as it ever was. OpenWDDX.org is definitely getting long in the tooth however. I've created an updated WDDX JS parser here: http://www.depressedpress.com/Content/Development/JavaScript/Extensions/DP_W DDX/ It's a more concise and "modern". And (at least in my tests) quite a bit faster on most operations. Also, in case you're interested I've also designed my own data exchange layer that tries to improve on the basic ideas of WDDX (passing structured data) here: http://www.depressedpress.com/Content/Development/YODEL/Index.cfm I'm using it very successfully on several projects. It works very similar to WDDX but (unlike WDDX) can be validated using XML Schema, supports methods for shrinking file size and some other (I think) neat stuff. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:273578 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
