A load balancer at both ends is standard practice. Any decent one will be
application aware.

Have a look at a BigIP F5.




"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Wood
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tue Mar 27 00:32:14 2007
Subject: RE: Targetting an instance

How?  The load balancer would have no knowledge of any of the CF
instances.  It simply knows that there are N number of servers running
IIS.  Once the hardware load balancer handed off the request its job is
done.  It has nothing to do with which CF instance processes the
request.

~Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 5:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Targetting an instance

Well, any decent load balancer would be able to load balance at both
ends.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. 
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS 

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:273816
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to