Rick Faircloth wrote:
> I know you're approaching this from the perspective of handling
> those who don't use js... but I'm leaning toward assuming js,
> and letting the rest go.

You do realize that you are not just letting go of everybody corporate, 
but also of everybody mobile?


> I've never had js disabled on any system or network I've ever owned
> or managed and I've never had a single problem with it.

Neither have I on any network I ever managed. But on the 3 departments 
of the national government where I work occasionally and that are 
managed by an IT department advanced javascript will not work. Neither 
does it on the networks of companies like the seven sisters. But maybe 
we just work for a different type of clients.


> The "Web 2.0" functionality is going to force the issue.  With Google
> and other basically "thumbing their nose" at those who won't use js
> with apps like Gmail (at least that's what I understand)

Why not verify that before you write it? Just disable javascript and try 
to use GMail. Some of the productivity features may not work, but you 
can still read your email without a problem.

Jochem

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIA’s for your business. Upgrade now
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:275513
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to