> I can speak only for Railo, but I assume in MX it is almost the same. 
> By 
> setting a cfoutput tag you turn on a switch for the engine to write 
> the 
> output to the response buffer and to interpret pound signs or not. It 
> 
> also depends on the <cfsetting enablecfoutputonly> tag. So I guess it 
> 
> would be a little more performant if you use only on <cfoutput> around 
> 
> your document.
> In Railo you can nest y<cfoutput> as often as you like. The funny 
> thing 
> is, that you can not nest <cfoutput> in files but you could do 
> something 
> like this:
> 
> <cfoutput>
> <cfinclude template="test.cfm">
> </cfoutput>
> 
> whereas test.cfm contains:
> 
> <cfoutput>
....
> 
> </cfoutput>
> 
> But keep in mind, that you might generate a lot of unnecessary output 
> 
> when surrounding your complete template with a <cfoutput>.
> 
> Inside <cfoutput query=""> nesting <cfoutput> is necessary in order to 
> 
> act on value changes in the query columns, if you use the group 
> attribute.
> 
> Greetings / Grüsse
> Gert Franz
> Customer Care
> Railo Technologies GmbH
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.railo.ch
> 
> Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei:
> deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/
> english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/
> 
> 
> 
> Greg Johnson schrieb:
> > First question, which is better, wraping an entire .cfm file with a 
> CFOUTPUT, or only using the tags where you need them in the docutment?  
> Whichever answer, why?  And finaly, other then the fact that CF won't 
> accept nested CFOUTPUTs with different queries, why won't it?
> >
> > 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. 
Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:276284
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to