> No specific named methodology. Frameworks? Model-Glue, Fusebox, ColdSpring, Transfer.
Interesting. Not Mach-II anymore? "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Sean Corfield To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Apr 30 04:31:07 2007 Subject: Re: Which Framework do you use... (if any) On 4/28/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just what frameworks/methologies are people using, if any? No specific named methodology. Frameworks? Model-Glue, Fusebox, ColdSpring, Transfer. > from research it seems > people fleet between them etc which seems futile. I think a few fairly high profile people have talked publicly about using several frameworks. I don't think any real "research" would should that "people fleet between them". Most people seem to settle on a given set of frameworks and stick with them. Sure, there are always going to be a few "switchers" but those really are the outliers in the community. I know a lot of hardcore Fuseboxers using FB3, for example, and also a lot of Model-Glue folks using MG1.x. You can hardly accuse them of "fleeting" between frameworks! > There must be one which > is faster, more productive and which just seems "the best"? Like Dave Watts I'll ask "why?"... different frameworks suit different people and different projects. It's not a decision anyone can - or should - make for you. I liked "Zaphod"s comment about the Accord - very applicable here. Ask this question on the FB forums and they'll probably tell you Fusebox is the answer. Ask it on the MG forums and they'll tell you Model-Glue. Ask it on the M2 forums and they'll tell you Mach II. > Which one has the most backing? Hard to say - they all have active communities and mailing lists. > The most long-term vision and lifecycle? Again, hard to say. Most of the frameworks' teams have an idea about the next two or three releases. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:276536 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
