Andrew,
this is the second post that I have read in as many days  (the other was the
frameworks thread) where you have come into the discussion throwing a lot of
attitude around. If you've got something constructive to add, I would love
to hear from you. Otherwise, keep it to yourself.... or don't, I'm blocking
your emails after this anyway.

Obviously there some people that find this versioning method lacking. The
difference between their posts and yours is that they present reasons and
try to explain why the method may be shortsighted. Yours is just arrogant
and insulting. Since you know everything and only seem to be here to insult
people, I encourage you to move along... the rest of us are trying to learn
or teach something here.

I hope you're a nicer guy in person than you come across on this email list.

~Max


On 5/7/07, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hehe,
>
> Thats the funniest piece of development I have seen in a long time....
>
> Remind me to blog about how stupid of an idea that actually is.
>
>
>
> On 5/8/07, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/7/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Versions in the way of what you have done, how to get back, backup
> > source.
> > >
> > > "Version control"
> >
> >
> >
> > ~filenameBAK070507.cfm
> >
> > setup a hook in application.cfc that doesn't allow access to files with
> ~
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion MX7 by AdobeĀ®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. 
Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:277203
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to