> Moral: write better programs in CF and CF will get less criticism...

Very well said Sean!

On 5/9/07, Eric J. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was only peeved regarding the talk of the platform CF runs on, as in it 
> only runs with x,y,z.  It does more than on IIS and SQL!! : )
>
> What you said beyond that, absolutely!!
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Eric J. Hoffman
> Managing Partner
> 2081 Industrial Blvd
> StillwaterMN55082
> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www: http://www.ejhassociates.com
> tel: 651.717.4105
> fax: 651.717.4101
> mob: 651.245.2717
> Adobe Solutions Partner
> Microsoft Certified Partner
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are not [email protected] you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be 
> secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Eric J. Hoffman 
> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If 
> verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 2:07 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Lack of CF understanding: Info Week
>
> On 5/5/07, Eric J. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not to add to the hornet's nest....well, okay maybe, but back to the
> > issues we deal with in perceptions with CF.  This time not price, just a
> > pure lack of focus on what the CF platform can do from a review of a
> > site that moved from a mixed bag of CF and .Net to Java after
> > acquisitions:
>
> The article singles out TripHomes mostly for the reliance on MS tech
> that has caused problems. What they want is to move away from MS tech.
> It's unfortunate they mention CF is somewhat unflattering terms but
> most of the criticism is (rightly) aimed at MS tech.
>
> "hidden disadvantage of the .Net approach is that the resulting Web
> site is harder to manage"
>
> "It's more difficult to scale .Net, it's harder to monitor in a
> large-scale deployment," Buhrdorf says. "Java can scale up on small
> Linux servers, and you get better insight into the production
> environment."
>
> The comments about the CF app's architecture were not aimed at CF but
> at the architecture:
>
> The old TripHomes site had stored its home images, data, and
> programming logic in the form of stored procedures in the database on
> a single disk drive, "giving us a single point of failure,"
>
> And, indeed, that was extremely bad practice. CF is based on Java -
> the tech that they like!
>
> There's really nothing critical of CF here, just criticism of bad practices.
>
> Moral: write better programs in CF and CF will get less criticism...
> --
> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. 
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS 

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:277468
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to