Hey Chris,

Yep, there are a few sites running on the Unity core.

MG:U supports both Reactor and Transfer - if you grab the latest from  
SVN, it's just a matter of commenting in the right part of your app's  
ColdSpring config file.

-Joe

On May 10, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Peterson, Chris wrote:

> Joe,
>
> I was hesitating to jump onto the beta MG:U because this is such a  
> major
> deal for my client, and MG:U is still beta.  I honestly haven't even
> downloaded the Unity release for only that reason, and went with the
> lately 1.x release.  I followed along Ray Camden's Model Glue series,
> and I have got most of my needs mapped out in Transfer now and that is
> running great under my MG 1.x site.  Do you think I should evaluate  
> the
> MG:U software (which from my understanding uses Reactor instead of
> Transfer)?  I don't have any production code written yet, its all been
> test cases and design work so far.  Are there any production sites out
> there running unity under high traffic?
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Rinehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:36 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: MG + Transfer for multiple sites from same code folder
>
> Hey Chris,
>
> If you're on the MG 2.0 code base (Unity), use two different
> ColdSpring.xml files to configure the application for the context -  
> just
> edit index.cfm to switch which one to use based on host, etc.
>
> -Joe
>
> On May 10, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Peterson, Chris wrote:
>
>> I am writing my first site using MG and Transfer ORM.
>>
>> I want to serve 2 sites with similar code bases and many shared
>> functions, but which pull from separate databases.  In my
>> application.cfc file, I have a cfswitch on #lcase(trim
>> (cgi.HTTP_HOST))#, then I check www.sitename.com, or sitename.com,  
>> and
>
>> initialize my cfapplication tag, as well as my singleton for transfer
>> (each site has its own transfer config files).  Is there anything
>> wrong with doing it this way, should I totally separate my code base
>> (which I don't want to do for ease up management / update  
>> purposes) or
>
>> will this run well?
>> This
>> is a very high traffic site, and I cant wait to take advantage of
>> Transfer and MG's caching mechanisms.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion MX7 by AdobeĀ®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. 
Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:277821
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to