I mean deploy.

So, some how, I go from my dev box, to the test server then finally to the
production server.
Other developers will also deploy to the test server.

As I understand it, we wont want to commit anything to the trunk until it
has been signed off in test.

So in that case, if trunk is always stable, we can just update the
production server from the trunk.
This makes that side very simple. And that being the most important part -
that is a good thing :-)
And I guess at that same time the trunk can be tagged - eg
/tags/prod-20070515

Now I am just left with the bit in between all the dev servers and the test
server.
Branching seems to me the way to go for major bug fixes and new features.
Ensuring an mods to the truck get merged into the branches then updated into
the dev machine(s)
Then, to my thinking, once the bug has been signed off in test, I should be
able to merge it into the trunk.

Hmmm, time to do some testing and see what happens...

On 5/15/07, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Deploy? If you mean deploy to production, thats always trunk.
>
> Or do you mean deploy from your code to the repository, that's commit.
>
>
>
> On 5/15/07, AJ Mercer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > OK, irrespective of whether the trunk or branches are used
> > how do you selectively chose what you want to deploy?
> >
> > If I have 5 bug fixes on the go bug001 - bug005,
> > and bug004 is signed off
> > how would I use subversion to know which files need to be updated on
> > production (without any of the work on bugs 1,2,3,5 going over)?
> >
> > On 5/15/07, Andrew Scott < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > AJ,
> > >
> > > Welcome to the world of many ways to skin a cat.
> > >
> > > We do it the same way I outlined a few times now, but others have
> > diffeent
> > > ways to do it.
> > >
> > > When working on something that is either new or a bug, the code is
> > looked
> > > at
> > > and fixed now until it is fixed, tested with unit tests and the
> > > development
> > > tested we do not commit it back to SVN.
> > >
> > > Thats our procedure, but as I said earlier, we also sync the changes
> to
> > > make
> > > sure we don't need to merge any new code, and then when its tested,
> > merged
> > > on our code with the repository we then commit it.
> > >
> > > Thats our method, and others have many other ways of doing it.
> >
>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:278126
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to