Sometimes I like to create a structure of arrays, instead of an array
of structures.  This lets me reference the data in the familiar syntax
of accessing CFQuery data....

structName.fieldName[rownumber]

But if there is a possibility of needing more dimensions, I won't use
this approach.


On 5/23/07, Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
>
>
> I'm looking for some advice on whether I should be using a 2 dimensional
> array or a array of structs for this kind of thing. I'm looking to store a
> list of users in an array, but also some other information on them, similar
> to a virtual table I guess, like this.
>
>
>
> Name                    LastSeen              Event
>
> Rob                        01-01-2007          Emailing
>
> Dave                      01-01-2007          News
>
> John                      02-01-2007          Users
>
> Paul                       03-01-2007          Emailing
>
>
>
> Now should i be creating an array of structs for this? With each element of
> the array containing a structure with name, lastseen and event in it? Or
> should I just use a two dimensional array? Is there any real benefit between
> the two for performance?
>
>
>
> Or perhaps I use a struct of structs? So then I can do
> Application.Userlist.Rob.LastSeen or something like that? Is it possible to
> dynamically name a structure key?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
ColdFusion MX7 by AdobeĀ®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. 
Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:279442
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to