I have worked for several large high traffic companies(American Medical Association, Smith Bucklin and Associates, Shedd Aquarium, AT&T, etc..) that use CF for their sites and haven't seen a problem. Even back in the 3.4.5 days, the company I worked for got millions of hits a day (American Medical Association). This was on a NT4 server (donât remember how much memory).
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting Well originally they ran CF5. Truthfully though, I wonder how well CF is suited for high traffic sites until it's supported on 64-bit JDK. 2gigs of RAM is not much these days, especially if you're replicating sessions over a lot of cluster members. Russ > -----Original Message----- > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:40 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting > > Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in > this argument... > > On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> ... a bunch of crap. There are plenty of high-volume sites using CF. > > > > No doubt. Two words as one... MySpace. If that isn't the most defining > > example of a high load application, I don't know what is. > > -- > mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: > http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe® Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7. Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJV Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:280625 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
