Well, what about invoking functions from within the circuit.xml file. Again, I am thinking about upgrading the framework that I use (a modified fusebox framework).
FB5 looks good but I wanted to move away from the "act_add_member.cfm" and "qry_list_member.cfm" methodology which seperates database calls to the same entity into two files; to a methodology that puts all "member" database request in one file with dmany functions. In other words, a "member" cfc file. I am concerned that fusebox does not support nor leverage the value of .cfc objects. ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "J.J. Merrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:32:05 -0500 > >Since Fusebox 4.1 and the incorporation of the total rewrite it has been a >priority to make all new releases of FB be backwards compatible. Essentially >anything that runs in 5 is going to work in 5.5 and 6.0. > >I would say start to dive in now since there isn't going to be such a large >rewrite in the future where you are going to have to learn a bunch of new >things. The changes like we saw in 3 > 4.1 are not going to happen in a >future release for a very very long time. > >J.J. M > > >On 6/16/07, Dwayne Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I stopped using fusebox once FB3 was implement. It just got a little to >> complex for me. However I stuck with the basic concepts of fuses and >> circuites. My circuit files are still basically one big cfswitch / cfcase >> tag. >> >> I am considering moveing to FB5. It seems attractive becuase the Fusebox >> Framework appears to be blackbox and it seems that I don't need to ticker >> with any non-value added details. >> >> I am also attracted to the concept of converting my cfswitch structure to >> a nice circuit.xml file. Furthermore the dot notation for the fuseaction >> request is very appealing; now my "index.cfm?action= >> browseFirm&perform=showService List" can be replaced with "index.cfm?fuseacti >> on=browseFirm. showServiceList" Cool. >> >> Basically I like alot about th FB5 format but now there's talk about FB6 >> or FBMX. Should I wait? >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:281390 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
