Maybe it was/is a branch?
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Scott To: CF-Talk Sent: Sat Jun 30 04:44:30 2007 Subject: Re: CFEclipse not compatible w/ Eclipse 3.3 But it is not in the Source Repository.... I thought that this was used for bleeding edge development? On 6/30/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm sure Mark would explain in more detail but in a nutshell, Mark and the > other guys who worked on the project had to add a lot of work to get > Eclipse > to get things such as drag-n-drop text working (since that was not a > native > feature to the Eclipse IDE.) > > Well, with Eclipse v3.3 the editor now supports several of the things that > previously were coded especially for CFEclipse--which part of the reason > things break in v3.3. > > I'm sure as soon as Mark feels like he's got a viable solution that he > feels > is stable enough, a release will show up. > > -Dan > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:13 PM > >To: CF-Talk > >Subject: Re: CFEclipse not compatible w/ Eclipse 3.3 > > > >Hmm, why isnt that in the Source Repository then? > > > >I have been wanting that for so long, the editor currently crashes in > >Eclipse 3.3. > > > > > > > >On 6/30/07, Greg Morphis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Uh I believe Mark was showing CFEclipse 1.3 on Eclipse 3.3 during his > >> presentation at CFUnited this afternoon. Awesome job with that Mark.. > >> great session! > >> > >> On 6/29/07, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > No 3.3 changes the rules, and I am sure Mark will go into more > details > >> as to > >> > why. > >> > > >> > btw there is cfeclipse mailing list, that mark might read faster than > >> > posting here. > >> > > >> > > >> > On 6/30/07, henry ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > I can't get CFEclipse to work with Eclipse 3.3, how about you guys? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:282613 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
