Mark, How would a case of Jack contribute? Dude, I saw your session at CFUnited and I would buy u 10 cases of Jack for all the time you have saved me with your great plug-in. I think I speak for a lot of other CF developers as well, hell of job and thank you.
Cheers... Dave -----Original Message----- From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFEclipse not compatible w/ Eclipse 3.3 Brian is right, I WAS running CFEclipse on Eclipse 3.3 but I have found some bugs and missing features I want to update to make sure they are working, not just on Eclipse 3.3 but on 3.2 and even 3.1. Dean Harmon did a lot of coding at CFUnited and we got a running version, now this running version runs from debug but there are some issues with actually deploying it (not just running it as a debug) which I am trying to fix before I check something in. My process for check-ins tends to be that every check in relates to a bug and most of the time I am trying to check in something that closes that bug. So stick with 3.2 and in the coming days I shall do a release that you can try out, there are other things in that release that I want to polish off and give a usable product, rather than a bleeding edge (because it takes a lot of effort to do an update site, so might as well do it for a useful version) So, we ARE on the case, and if you think about it, its rather unfair to expect a release a WEEKEND after they have released 3.3. I barely managed to download Eclipse 3.3 FINAL at the airport on the way home... and you already want a fixed, tested, and deployed version by monday (when I was doing a talk on saturday and flying home on sunday/ monday). This is a team of one. ME. Its like expecting all the CF5 applications to work the day CF 6 was released with both quality assurance and deployment on lots of platforms with different databases. I am also deploying *NEW* functionality so need to make sure that works and makes sense! So bear with me please. Or, bloody well contribute and try and fix the bugs yourselves! Mark Drew On 2 Jul 2007, at 15:46, Brian Kotek wrote: > It's a "bleeding edge" version of the codebase but it isn't the actual > development repository. What goes into bleeding edge is still what he > considers to be relatively stable (enough to let others use). So think > of it as Beta or Release Candidate code, but not Alpha or pre-Alpha. > > Don't worry, it's coming. He's having to rework a good bit of stuff > since the changes in 3.3 are quite extensive under the hood. > > > On 7/2/07, Dan G. Switzer, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> But it is not in the Source Repository.... >>> >>> I thought that this was used for bleeding edge development? >> >> Quite frankly, I wouldn't blame Mark at all for not checking in code >> which he thought still was buggy to public repositories. If he checks >> in code that he knows is buggy, he's just going to end up opening the >> flood gates with questions. >> >> Now, I'm sure if he got more people who were actively helping with >> development that policy might change. >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:282761 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
