The C++ behind Cold Fusion Server 4.5 is also "server side".
For this to be true, the C++ code behind Cold Fusion Server 4.5 must be really bad
and both the C++ code behind the Java Runtime and the Java code itself for the Cold
Fusion server must be really good.
I'm not saying it's impossible... just not likely due to the fact that C++ is compiled
and Java is interpreted by a program written in C++.
At 09:42 PM 11/10/00 +0000, David E. Crawford wrote:
>> That's all great, and I am looking forward to these improvements.
>> However It's hard to believe that a Java engine will be faster than a C++
>engine.
>>
>> (The Java interpreter itself is written in C++. C++ is compiled directly
>to machine code. Think about it)
>>
>
>Well, at least in theory, the demonstration during the general assembly
>seems to prove that the Java-based engine is faster. Keep in mind that this
>is server side java which has had a great deal of optimization attention
>paid to it.
>
>DC
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
>with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Theobald, Chief Technology Officer
LiquidStreaming http://www.liquidstreaming.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone 1.212.545.1232 x204 Fax 1.212.545.0938
To put this contact information into your Palm device, click here:
http://www.coola.com/cgi-bin/addinfo.cgi?pid=15803&rid=972879910&type=A
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
