Again though Jim - you can't just look at speed - but quality of output. Remember that Adobe erred on the side of quality over speed, but lets you change the quality to speed up performance.
On 8/21/07, Jim Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had done some tests recently to try to determine if I wanted to move > some code over to using cfimage...here are some results. I tried to > just run these tests with the defaults of each method. This was run > on a shared host. Not scientific, but I don't think I will move away > from Efflare quite yet for my bulk processing. The table of times is > just a loop resizing the same image over and over. > > http://www.wrightster.com/resize/testresults.html > > In my testing, I also saw both cfimage and imagecfc spike up to 3 or 4 > seconds (probably due to other processing on the shared host), and I > did not see that with Efflare. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Enterprise web applications, build robust, secure scalable apps today - Try it now ColdFusion Today ColdFusion 8 beta - Build next generation apps Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:286718 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
