Jon,
>
> Everyone except those who dont have time to learn or care to
> learn Fusebox.
> When the day comes that someone dumps a site on me that was coded in
> Fusebox, and this is my main beef with the whole deal.
> It's going to take me LONGER to learn Fusebox and then go about adding the
> lastest widget!
>
I think that maybe you haven't seen any Fusebox code.
I write fusebox-esque code all the time. Like everyone that use fusebox I
use different bits of the methodology, but all of us use the same basic
structure.
I recently had a guy who hasn't ever looked at fusebox pick up my code and
start making changes. I asked if he had any questions, his was response was
'No, seems clear enough.'
Also, part of the fusebox concept is that you _can_ add new 'widgets'
without knowing what the other parts of the application are doing. Part of
the reason that Steve Nelson et al. came up with Fusebox was to help them
with a large project that was being built by a number of remote developers.
Fusebox was developed to allow them to hand a section or circuit (e.g. the
search) from the whole application to a developer and he/she could build it
without needing to thing about the rest of the application. All the parts
then came together under a common index.cfm to build the complete
application.
Regards
Stephen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
