Because it becomes a mess when doing includes? Also how would people handle "arguments" via includes? The few attempts I have seen relied on people setting variables before the include and that got messy very quickly. I'd do custom tags before includes but I use CFCs and would not say that most of my CFC implementations are OO at all.
On Feb 6, 2008 2:49 PM, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 12:24 PM, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't agree with that at all. > > > > the use of CFCs doesn't necessarily have anything to do with object > > oriented design. Lots of CFCs are just groupings of functions to > > perform application tasks. But they're not really object oriented at > > all, they're functional. > > just 'cuz i think this could be an interesting convo... then why use > CFCs at all? if you're just grouping similar functions together, why > not just a cfinclude to a .cfm? > > paul kenney actually addressed this a lil' while back: > http://www.pjk.us/paul/index.cfm/2007/4/11/Why-do-you-use-CFCs > > interesting read :) > > -- > Evelyn the dog, having undergone further modification pondered the > significance of short-person behaviour in pedal depressed, > pan-chromatic resonance, and other highly ambient domains. "Arf," she > said. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:298407 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
