henry ho wrote: > Very interesting for someone who'd like to get his hand dirty with Flex like > me. However, how different would it be if CF is used in place of Grials?
well for one thing you wouldn't spend "about 2 months on this site, figuring out how to get Flex, Flash and Grails to work together nicely". cf & flex just works. >> Lesson 2: Grails REST services beats BlazeDS. To a bloody pulp. > CF Flex remote support? james ward actually took the trouble to gather some facts: http://www.jamesward.com/wordpress/2007/04/30/ajax-and-flex-data-loading-benchmarks/ while processing w/e4x is pretty good, it's bandwidth usage is still bad compared to AMF (text vs binary). i guess this depends on what your backend is producing & your application but i'd still say cf on the backend is a better choice for talking to a flex front-end. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:309837 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
