Justin / Dave,

Thanks for your replies. Yes, I'm seeing from the little bit of research that 
I'm doing that XSLT might not do what I need it to and introduce a certian 
level of risk to the project.

I am interested in learning more about highly abstracted form generation if any 
one has any links on this to share.

If either of you are able to shed a little more light on the TEXT/pipe 
technique or the database technique I'd be greatly appreciative. Don't go way 
out of your way though. I'll keep researching.

Thanks!
BN

>> XSLT is not a "config file" though. It's a Turing-complete programming
>> language that will let you transform one XML language to another, or to
>> HTML. CF will also let you do that sort of thing, and it'll generally be a
>> lot easier.
>
>Indeed.  On the web XSLT is great if you want to pass the XML file/data 
>directly to the browser and have the browser render it in a certain way 
>(using XSLT to convert the XML to HTML output).  If you're running it 
>through ColdFusion anyway, it's easier to write CF than deal with XSLT.
>
>> I wouldn't get too hung up on the idea of representing your forms as XML,
>> either. You can represent reusable form elements just as easily with a
>> relational database.
>
>I'll second that also.  One project I worked on we just defined the form 
>fields in a pipe-delimited text file that would get read and parsed into 
>a ColdFusion application variable.  Then we had a custom tag that we 
>could call and it would generate all of the HTML for each form field in 
>whatever "form" definition we needed.
>
>
>-Justin Scott 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:310312
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to