My thoughts on why duplicate might perform better than xmlparse went something like this: Which takes longer? reinstalling and configuring a server from scratch, or running Norton Ghost and simply copying over an image...
Has anyone filed this with Adobe yet? http://www.adobe.com/go/wish/ ~Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 10:22 AM Subject: Re: XMLSearch not thread safe >A duplicate() deep copy will work in a similar way to the XMLParse as you >say. > > We're comparing various workarounds including duplicate() and > reparsing. If anyone else gets the time to do this we can compare > notes. > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Brad Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> James, to confirm then, does it work properly if you duplicate the >> application variable before passing it into xmlsearch? >> It would seem more effecient to duplicate an object than to recreate it >> each >> time with xmlparse. I could be totally wrong on that though since I'm not >> realy sure how duplicate works on the inside. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:310522 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
