If I used a table, it would look like this:
<table>
<tr>
<td>link 1</td>
<td>link 4</td>
<td>link 7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>link 2</td>
<td>link 5</td>
<td>link 8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>link 3</td>
<td>link 6</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
Whereas the UL method like this:
<ul>
<li>link 1</li>
<li>link 4</li>
<li>link 7</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>link 2</li>
<li>link 5</li>
<li>link 8</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>link 3</li>
<li>link 6</li>
<li></li>
</ul>
So it's a little lighter, codewise, plus ULs and LIs are MEANT to display
lists of things while tables are not.
-----Original Message-----
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Outputting columned UL tags
>>ULs and LIs are better for search engine optimization.
???
>>Plus they're better semantic code.
???
--
_______________________________________
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:310958
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
