Well, I think we're in general agreement that Adobe should re-consider the architecture of the cf8 product which would make it much more flexible, hence, more options/opportunities for all (provider itself = Adobe, and a broad range of developers... etc. etc.). Also, along this line of thought, Adobe could leave the currently cf8 intact for one market segment (the big spenders), and add a new architecture to its 'twin cf8' which is essentially in the vain of what is proposed... that's one approach I guess.
> Andrew Scott >As far as I am concerned, Adobe should NOT charge for the actual engine and >it should be adopted to support plugins. > ... > Andrew Scott ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:311125 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
