....Which I have run into with MG...most of what we are doing is made overly complex by using MG, which in turns made it overly difficult to debug when we had probs. I can see where MG would be very useful for a very complex application...but I don't think it is the solution for everyone. I personally prefer the ease of use and flow of FB (or more specifically, my bastardized version of FB ;-) which based on a combination of my personal coding style that is very close to a fusebox-esque style and a version that we were forced to use due to <emp>draconian</emp> server restrictions at AT&T ).
Eric /*-----Original Message----- /*From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /*Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 11:01 AM /*To: CF-Talk /*Subject: Re: fusebox vs model glue /* /*>denstar wrote: /*>> Sounds like with FB you could end up with a Pretty Entertaining /*Environment. /*> /*>*groans* /*> /*>> Is there a down side to all the flexibility? :-) /*> /*>Yes. It means that no 2 application developers will develop websites the /*>same way. Though IMHO, that's not much of a downside. /* /*It could also mean that you end up with it going down the TOtally /*Ineffective Ludicrous Entertaining Technology or TOILET. /* /*ok its been a long weekend. /* /* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:311879 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
