Ok... Thanx All. Now this one is kicking my butt. <cfset mystring = "MyServiceObj.delete#arguments.MyTable#(#arguments.MyPK# = myBeanObj.get#arguments.MyPK#())" />
<cfreturn evaluate(mystring) /> Using tblUsers it would render this <cfset MyServiceObj.deleteTableUsers (UserID = myBeanObj.getUserID())" /> Is this possible with out using CFinvoke or Evaluate? Sorry about this. One of the joys of having written language LD. Syntax kicks my ass. ~G~ On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Adrian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Oh and you might also try this: > > <cfset theMethodIWantToRun = myService["save#ARGUMENTS.myTable#"]> > <cfset theMethodIWantToRun(myBeanObj)> > > I have a feeling this doesn't work as I remember doing something like this > in the past and then went back to using cfinvoke. > > Adrian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 September 2008 16:34 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: How NOT to Evaluate (moved from cfset so not to confuse > topic) > > > Try... > > <cfset myService = APPLICATION[ARGUMENTS.myTable & "Service"]> > > This would be nice: > > <cfset myService["save" & ARGUMENTS.myTable](myBeanObj)> > > But instead you have to do: > > <cfinvoke component="#myService#" method="save#ARGUMENTS.myTable#" > returnvariable="aVarIfYouWantOne"> > <cfinvokeargument name="myBeanObj" value="#myBeanObj#"> > </cfinvoke> > > Check that cfinvoke though, I don't normally use it. > > Adrian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 September 2008 16:15 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: How NOT to Evaluate (moved from cfset so not to confuse > topic) > > > While we are on the subject. I know I have asked this before.... But I > still > haven't figured out a way to do this. > I have a bunch of CFC's loaded in memory that I want to call based on the > The table name. Is there a way to avoid using evaluate in cases like this: > > <cfset MyServiceObj = evaluate("Application.#arguments.MyTable#Service") > /> > > <cfset mystring = "MyServiceObj.save#arguments.MyTable#(myBeanObj)" /> > > <cfreturn evaluate(mystring) /> > > Many TIA > > ~G~ > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Adrian Lynch > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Good question. > > > > [] are CF constructs. These two are equivalent: > > > > FORM.someVar = 101 > > > > and > > > > FORM["someVar"] = 101 > > > > You'd use the latter for dynamic variable names: > > > > FORM["someVar" & i] > > > > Deffo use cfqps, have a look back in the cf-talk archives to see a bunch > of > > trouble caused by the lack of them in SQL statements. > > > > Also take note of Mark's post, the fact you're creating column names > > dynamically will also be a problem, one that cfqp can't solve. > > > > Adrian > > > > > > -- > "We would be eternally miserable if our errors worried us too much because > as we push forward we will make plenty more." > > Ernest O. Lawrence > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:312330 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
