Hahahahahahhahahahaaa, that gave me the first good laugh of the day, CFFormProtect very hard to configure (in any Fusebox app) ;-) Thanx for cheering up my day with an intense felt laughter ;-)
Sorry about that, but I think you understand that I have to disagree with you about difficulties of setting up CFFormProtect. I've set it up in simple CFM-pages, in Fusebox 2, 3 and 5.5 (noXML) apps in less than one minute. If you need pointers or any help, feel free to e-mail me (off-list if you wish: sebgmc - at - hotmail - . - com). Sebastiaan ================================= So long and thanx 4 all the fish ==> Onlinebase.nl > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:30:53 -0700 > Subject: Re: ADA Captcha > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > I found CFFormProtect to be very hard to configure and set up (in > fusebox). reCapatcha, I set up in about 4 mins. (just did it) and it > works perfectly. > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Sebastiaan GMC van > Dijk<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Captcha's are SOOO passe! > > Toss out the Captcha and make use of CFFormProtect, available from > > RIAForge.com ;-) > > No extra user input, coupled to Akismet and Project Honeypot, and all CFC > > ;-) > > > > Sebastiaan > > ================================= > > So long and thanx 4 all the fish > > > > ==> Onlinebase.nl > >> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:51:58 -0700 > >> Subject: Re: ADA Captcha > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> Dave Watts wrote: > >> > While I do think you're right about reCAPTCHA being ADA-compliant, I > >> > would still recommend avoiding the use of CAPTCHAs at all. "ADA > >> > compliant" doesn't necessarily equate with "easy to use". > >> > >> While I don't disagree that there are costs and cons to weigh when using > >> a captcha. I find the Carnegie-Mellon one to be less annoying then > >> most. They don't do *really* funky things with the words like toss the > >> letters like salad or use horrid backgrounds. They actually use the > >> creative idea of taking a fairly human readable word that has already > >> failed computer recognition when it was scanned and OCR'ed from a > >> digitalization project, currently the NY Times. And combines this with > >> a word that has already been solved by humans. > >> > >> Thus you get a pair of fairly straight forward words that have always > >> been simple for me to understand at least. That has not always been > >> true with other, more homegrown captcha systems. Plus you get the > >> community benefit of helping digitalize pre-computer printed works. I > >> feel that offsets quite a bit of the cons of captcha's in general. As > >> well as that Carnegie-Mellon has also included the ADA compliance portion. > >> > >> But, as always, your (general) millage may vary and only you (general) > >> can make the decision on what is best for your (general) given project > >> of the day. > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:325482 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
